USPTO serial 75552309
VIVA MODEL MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIVA MODEL MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LORA A. MOFFATT
LORA A MOFFATT SALANS620 FIFTH AVEROCKEFELLER CTRNEW YORK, NY 10020Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Viva Model Management (S.A.R.L.)
- Other trademarks owned by Viva Model Management (S.A.R.L.)
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VIVA MODEL MANAGEMENT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |