USPTO serial 75552822
INCENTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INCENTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerry Cohen
JERRY COHEN PERKINS SMITH & COHEN1 BEACON STBOSTON, MA 02108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CREATING AND PUBLISHING REPORTS AND POSTING REPORTS AND PUBLICATIONS ON WEB PAGES THROUGH USE OF THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ASSET MANAGEMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2002 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |