USPTO serial 75552930
POWERBROOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWERBROOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oregon City, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert L. Harrington
ROBERT L HARRINGTONSTE 19201211 SW 5TH AVEPORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | hand held power-operated sweeping devices consisting of a power-rotated cylinder having a handle for manual manipulation and exterior fins that engage and throw loose material to thereby clean outdoor surfaces such as a sidewalk, driveway or the like | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |