Drawing for PIT LUB

USPTO serial 75553152

PIT LUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPIVAK, ANDREW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIT LUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joan Kupersmith Larkin

JOAN KUPERSMITH LARKIN SEYFARTH SHAWONE CENTURY PLZ2029 CENTURY PARK ELOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004industrial oils and automotive greases; industrial lubricants; dust laying and absorbing compositions for use on unpaved roads; gasoline fuels, including motorspirit; and illuminants; namely, candles, tapers and wicksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Sep 17, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 12, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 20, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 12, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 18, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 14, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 21, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 28, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 30, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 18, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance