Drawing for ORO-CREMA

USPTO serial 75553185

ORO-CREMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BATTLE, KENNETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ORO-CREMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

IAN JAY KAUFMAN

IAN JAY KAUFMAN LADAS & KAUFMAN26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023-7604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Biscuits, cookies pastries, cakes, and breadsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2000ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 11, 2000OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 11, 2000OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 5, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 27, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 7, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance