USPTO serial 75553606
INVISIBLE SHAPERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2439859Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 3, 2001
- Examiner
- MOORE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INVISIBLE SHAPERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keely L. Herrick
Keely L. Herrick Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP575 MADISON AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10022-2585UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | INTIMATE APPAREL AND FIGURE ENHANCING GARMENTS, NAMELY, BRAS, CAMISOLES, BODYSUITS, LONG UNDERWEAR, BIKER BRIEFS, PANTIES, PANT LINERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 25, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WARNACO U.S., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WARNACO U.S., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WARNACO INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WARNACO U.S., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named INVISIBLE SHAPERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 30, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |