Drawing for NEXT GENERATION

USPTO serial 75553705

NEXT GENERATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXT GENERATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jon Weisman

JON WIESMAN EXODUS BREEDERS SUPPLY LTD5470 MT PISGAH RDYORK, PA 17406-9200UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005veterinary semen extender, artificial breeding and insemination accessories, namely navel iodine, microbial paste, antibacterial scrub, nutripharmaceutical paste, cotton culture swabs, lubricantACTIVE—
009Artificial breeding and insemination accessories, namely, computer database software for the management of breeding servicesACTIVE—
010artificial breeding and insemination accessories, namely plastic rectal and insemination sleeves, insemination pipettes and catheters, semen gel filters, speculums, insemination kits consisting of plastic insemination sleeves, pipettes and lubricant, plastic artificial vaginal liners, and artificial vaginal coversACTIVE—
016artificial breeding and insemination accessories, namely printed data cards for the management of breeding servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 26, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 7, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance