USPTO serial 75553941
HOMETOWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BATTLE, KENNETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOMETOWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ryan R. Palmer
Suite 10008000 Norman Center DriveMinneapolis, MN 55437-1178Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |