Drawing for ANALYTIX

USPTO serial 75553943

ANALYTIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANALYTIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD W YOUNG

RICHARD W YOUNG GARDNER CARTON & DOUGLAS321 N CLARK ST STE 3400CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed materials, namely, books, journals, newspapers, magazines and booklets in the field of finance; printed teaching and instructional materials, namely, tables and diagrams in the field of finance; printing blocks; printing type; unmounted photographsACTIVE—
036financial analysis and consultation in the field of prices and trends in the finance markets; providing financial information, namely, information about exchange rates, business investment, fund investment and asset management; customer service for others in financial and currency exchange matters, namely, currency exchange and adviceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 27, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 200044EDSEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED—
Sep 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance