USPTO serial 75554047
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Philadelphia, PA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jim Zegeer
STE 108801 N PITT STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Golf shoe cleats | ACTIVE | Apr 24, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 4, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 14, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |