Drawing for SIDE GRIPPING ACTION

USPTO serial 75554047

SIDE GRIPPING ACTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIDE GRIPPING ACTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jim Zegeer

STE 108801 N PITT STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Golf shoe cleatsACTIVEApr 24, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 15, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 4, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 14, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 5, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 6, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 20, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2001CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
Oct 24, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 30, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 29, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance