USPTO serial 75554315
MICROFUSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2736975Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 15, 2003
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICROFUSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JACK V. MUSGROVE
JACK V MUSGROVE2911 BRIONA WOOD LNCEDAR PARK, TX 78613UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | PLASTIC PIPE FUSION SYSTEM CONSISTING OF BONDING MATERIALS, NAMELY, THERMOPLASTIC MATRIX WITH SUSCEPTOR PARTICLES, COUPLINGS AND HEATERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 10, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 8, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 17, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |