USPTO serial 75554457
SPIDER WEBDECK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPIDER WEBDECK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacie Foster
Stacie Foster Invicta Law Group, PLLC1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3310Seattle, WA 98104-1019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER DRIVEN SCAFFOLDING, SUSPENDED STAGING, WORK PLATFORMS AND SUSPENDED WORK CAGES; HOISTS; AND PARTS FOR ALL OF THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |