Drawing for BRIDGER

USPTO serial 75554458

BRIDGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BRIDGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott S. Havlick

SCOTT S HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART555 17TH ST STE 3200DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING SKIING AND SNOWBOARDING RELATED EQUIPMENT AND CLOTHINGACTIVEDec 1, 1997
041SKI AND SNOWBOARD RESORT SERVICES; SUMMER AND WINTER OPERATION OF SKI LIFTS TO FACILITATE SKIING, SNOWBOARDING, MOUNTAIN BIKING, HIKING AND OTHER RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIESACTIVEDec 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 6, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 26, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 16, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance