Drawing for LR AND DESIGN

USPTO serial 75554763

LR AND DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALVES, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LR AND DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

arry C. Kane

ARRY C KANE MILLER, JOHNSON, SNELLCUMMISKEY, PLCP O BOX 306GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-0306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS AND MERGER CONSULTATIONS; BUSINESS CONSULTATIONS; BUSINESS INVOICING SERVICES; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT PLANNING; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SUPERVISION; BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES; BUSINESS NETWORKING; BUSINESS PLANNING AND BUSINESS SUPERVISIONACTIVEJul 1, 1998
036FINANCIAL PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT; INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT; REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT AND RISK MANAGEMENTACTIVEJul 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 12, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 12, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 25, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 25, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 20, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance