Drawing for NOVAVISION

USPTO serial 75554766

NOVAVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3098417Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 30, 2006
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with NOVAVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John W. McGlynn

John W. McGlynn RatnerPrestiaPO Box 980Valley Forge, PA 19482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042medical care namely, housing patients and supplying them with food, testing, training and treating people with nervous system, neurological, ophthalmological and psychological impediments; development and design of computer processing programs for others; health care services, namely providing information relating to and connected to persons with nervous system, neurological, ophthalmological and psychological impediments featuring medical and psychological diagnosis and therapy processes via in-house, local, regional and global computer information networksACTIVEJan 28, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Aug 13, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Aug 13, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 23, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
May 30, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
May 23, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 23, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 23, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 15, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 30, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 30, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 8, 2006CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
May 1, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 11, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 27, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 23, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 13, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 2, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 13, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 16, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 30, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 13, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 10, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 10, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 19, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 21, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 28, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 20, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance