USPTO serial 75554799
EMAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2439603Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 27, 2001
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EMAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shijr, Taipei County, TW
Taipei, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew R. Etkind
ANDREW R ETKIND GARMIN INTERNATIONAL INC1200 E 151ST STOLATHE, KS 66062UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Navigational devices, namely, global positioning satellite based portable navigation receivers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 21, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 26, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |