USPTO serial 75554824
GLOBAL TV CONCEPTS, LTD.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLOBAL TV CONCEPTS, LTD.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Deerfield Beach, FL
Deerfield Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. Saccocio
RICHARD M SACCOCIO RICHARD M SACCOCIO, PA150 SE 12TH ST STE 300FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | preparation and dissemination of audio and video infomercials for the goods and services of others, not related to travel services, for broadcast of television | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |