USPTO serial 75554869
PYXIX INTERCHEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PYXIX INTERCHEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Helier, JerseyJE4 8PX, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL B. LASKY
MICHAEL B LASKY MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for use in manufacture of paint, ink, rubber, resin manufacturing, adhesives and electronics all for general and industrial use, tempering and soldering preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | Metals in foil and powder form for printers; interior and exterior paints varnishes and lacquers; raw natural resins for use in manufacture of paints, coatings, inks, rubber and adhesives | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Adhesives for stationery or household purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |