USPTO serial 75554971
SMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY H BEGLER
140 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10005-1101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | ELECTRONIC BLASTING SYSTEM COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF DETONATORS AND EXPLOSIVES, AND ALSO HAND HELD CONTROLLERS TO DOWNLOAD DETONATOR AND BLAST INFORMATION TO A FIRING BOX, A FIRING/BLAST BOX THAT PROVIDES ENERGY AND A DIGITAL SIGNAL TO ARM AND FIRE THE ELECTRONIC DELAY DETONATORS COMMUNICATED TO IT VIA THE HAND HELD CONTROLLER, A CABLE HARNESS THAT LINKS THE FIRING BOX TO THE ELECTRONIC DELAY DETONATORS, ELECTRONIC DELAY DETONATORS, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR CONTROLLING, TIMING, SEQUENCING AND INITIATION OF AN EXPLOSIVE CHARGE, ALL SOLD AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | MANUFACTURE TO THE ORDER AND SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS OF ELECTRONIC DETONATORS FOR EXPLOSIVES USED IN THE MINING INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DESIGN SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, DESIGNING THE PATTERN, LOADING AND DETONATION TIMING OF AN EXPLOSIVE CHARGE TO CONTROL THE SIZE AND POSITION OF THE EXPLODED ROCK; CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY, SELECTING, CHECKING, INSPECTING AND SUPERVISING EXPLOSIVES USED BY OTHERS IN THE MINING INDUSTRY, PROVIDING TECHNICAL, TECHNOLOGICAL, TESTING AND ADVISORY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF MINING EXPLOSIVES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sasol Mining Initiators (Proprietary) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Sasol Mining Initiators (Proprietary) Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SMI
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |