USPTO serial 75555041
VERO RED BOMB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OTTE, SARAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VERO RED BOMB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Guadalajara, Jalisco, MX
Guadalajara, Jalisco, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY V. NOVAK
GREGORY V NOVAK HOWREY SIMON ARNOLD & WHITE, LLP1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | HARD CANDIES, NAMELY SUCKERS AND LOLLIPOPS | ABANDONED | Jun 18, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 7, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 7, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |