USPTO serial 75555146
ZIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David P Cooper
DAVID P COOPER KOLISCH HARTWELL PC520 SW YAMHILL ST STE 2000PORTLAND, OR 97204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Beauty salon services, namely, hair cutting, coloring and styling, manicure and pedicure, skin care and massage | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |