USPTO serial 75555290
ICAT COMMERCE ONLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ICAT COMMERCE ONLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth A. Miller
KENNETH A MILLER ANDERSON GODWIN DE REGT, LLP601 UNION ST SUIT 3930SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computer services, namely, information storage and retrieval in the field of consumer product information; placing and preparing advertisements for others; dissemination of advertising for others via a global network of computers; providing shoppers' guides and statistical information for others; preparing audio-visual presentations for use in advertising for others; preparing, organizing, creating, managing and transmitting interactive catalogues on a global network of computers | ACTIVE | Mar 18, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |