USPTO serial 75555877
TOX IQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOX IQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BIOCHEMICAL COMPUTING INCORPORATED
Ottawa, Ontario, KIP 5H 1, CA
Other trademarks owned by BIOCHEMICAL COMPUTING INCORPORATED
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAM FOR USE IN COSMETIC, PHARMACEUTICAL AND CHEMICAL TESTING, ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS, BIOCHEMICAL AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH FOR THE PURPOSE OF TESTING AND ANALYSING THE HARMFUL EFFECTS OF CHEMICALS ON LIVING ORGANISMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |