USPTO serial 75555917
Serial No. 75555917
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75555917?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY B COY
GREGORY B COY WOODARD EMHARDT NAUGHTON MORIARTYBANK 1 CTR TWR111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Ground meat of beef and pork, baked ham, ground meat sandwiches, mixed ground meat and vegetable sandwiches, mixed ground meat and cheese sandwiches, canned beans, ice cream, milk shakes, [malted milk shakes,] crackers, sugar, frozen cut potatoes, chili powder, chili sauce, pickles, tomato ketchup, coffee | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1936 |
| 030 | Ground meat of beef and pork, baked ham, ground meat sandwiches, mixed ground meat and vegetable sandwiches, mixed ground meat and cheese sandwiches, canned beans, ice cream, milk shakes, [malted milk shakes,] crackers, sugar, frozen cut potatoes, chili powder, chili sauce, pickles, tomato ketchup, coffee | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1936 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |