Drawing for STEAK N SHAKE IN SIGHT IT MUST BE RIGHT

USPTO serial 75555920

STEAK N SHAKE IN SIGHT IT MUST BE RIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STEAK N SHAKE IN SIGHT IT MUST BE RIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GREGORY B COY

GREGORY B COY WOODARD EMHARDT NAUGHTON MORIARTYBANK 1 CTR TWR111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021dishes, cups and drinking glassesACTIVEAug 1, 1972

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 31, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 18, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 24, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance