CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ILSMA

USPTO serial 75556117

ILSMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2847084Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 1, 2004
Examiner
GOLDEN, JAMES B
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ILSMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOAN L LONG

JOAN L LONG MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAW LLPP O BOX 2828CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DATABASED AND PROGRAMMED MACHINE-READABLE DATA CARRIERS OF ALL TYPES, NAMELY BLANK COMPUTER DISCS, COMPUTER CHIPS, AND MAGNETIC CODED CARDS; DATA PROCESSORS AND PARTS THEREOFSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
016Computer software publications and instruction manuals used in the field of technical consultation relating to the operation of a computer center for othersSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
035OPERATING A COMPUTER CENTER BUSINESS FOR OTHERS; ORGANIZATIONAL CONSULTATION RELATED TO THE STRUCTURE AND OPERATION OF A COMPUTER CENTERSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
042DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND DATA PROCESSING PROGRAMS FOR OTHERS; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION RELATING TO THE OPERATION OF A COMPUTER CENTER FOR OTHERSSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2010C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jun 1, 2010C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jun 1, 2010C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jun 1, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 1, 2010ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 1, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2004IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Apr 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 20041.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Nov 3, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 21, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 14, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 6, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 31, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance