USPTO serial 75556614
ECOMOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOMOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
70435 Stuttgart, DE
70435 Stuttgart, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Liss
MARK J LISS LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Conveyor systems and conveyors, namely, overhead conveyors, power and free conveyors, electro-monorail conveyors, pendulum conveyors; inverted overhead conveyors, inverted power and free conveyors, inverted electro-monorail conveyors, inverted monorail conveyors; skid conveyors; pallet conveyors; slat conveyors; platform conveyors, belt conveyors, cross belt conveyors, buffer belt conveyors and suspension belt conveyors; chain conveyors, cross chain conveyors, buffer chain conveyors, and suspension chain conveyors, roller beds; manipulation devices, namely, gantry robots for linear gantries and for area gantries; lifting machines for transporting parceled goods in horizontal and/or vertical directions for storing of the parceled goods; lifting tables; turn tables; tilt tables; cross transfer devices, cross transfer cars, pallet stackers and destackers, skid testing stations and car body locking stations and parts of the aforesaid goods; controllers for conveyor systems, for conveyors, for manipulation devices and for manual, semi-automatic or automatic selective access to parceled goods stored in a single-level storage or a multi-level storage | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair in the field of conveyor systems, conveyors, manipulation devices for conveyors and storage and retrieval systems, namely, devices enabling a manual, semiautomatic selective access to parceled goods stored in a single-level storage or a multi-level storage, for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |