Drawing for GOTO.COM

USPTO serial 75556707

GOTO.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOTO.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERIC W GALLENDER

ERIC W GALLENDER BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROVIDING INFORMATION DIRECTORY SERVICES FOR A WIDE VARIETY OF TOPICS, AND REFERRALS TO WEB SITES THAT PROVIDE A WIDE VARIETY OF INFORMATION, PRODUCTS AND SERVICESACTIVE—
038ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTE COMMUNICATION NETWORK; PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER COMMUNICATION NETWORK FOR INFORMATION AND DATAACTIVE—
042ELECTRONIC NAVIGATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING SEARCH ENGINE SERVICES FOR OBTAINING DATA ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONSACTIVEDec 11, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 16, 1998IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance