USPTO serial 75556720
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF APPLIED CLINICAL NUTRITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 2001
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AMERICAN COUNCIL OF APPLIED CLINICAL NUTRITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Florissant, MO
Florissant, MO
Florissant, MO
Florissant, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM D. O'NEILL
WILLIAM D. O'NEILL Stinson LLP7700 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 1100St. Louis, MO 63105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS, [ CONFERENCES AND WORKSHOPS, ] DISTRIBUTING MATERIALS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH AND CONDUCTING PROFICIENCY TESTING ALL IN THE FIELD OF CLINICAL NUTRITION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, C. T.
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, C. T.
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, C. T.
- Other trademarks owned by Judith A. Smith
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named AMERICAN COUNCIL OF APPLIED CLINICAL NUTRITION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 30, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 30, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |