USPTO serial 75556795
DP NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DP NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tom Watson
TOM WATSON WATSON & RENNER2000 M ST NW STE 330WASHINGTON, DC 20036-3366UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | MONITORING AND DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION SERVICES FOR THE OPERATION FAILURE DETECTION OF ELECTRICITY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS; DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING GLOBAL AND LOCAL COMPUTER CENTERS FOR THE COLLECTION, TRANSLATION, TRANSMISSION, STORAGE, PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND REPORTING OF SUCH MONITORING AND DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION; ALARM SERVICES, NAMELY, WARNING OF UNDESIRABLE OPERATING CONDITIONS OR IMPENDING EQUIPMENT FAILURE; PROVIDING INFORMATION TO SAVE ENERGY, IMPROVE EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE, INCREASE SYSTEM RELIABILITY AND/OR CAPABILITY, REDUCE EXPENDITURES ON EQUIPMENT REPAIR AND/OR REPLACEMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |