USPTO serial 75557199
PRE PAY & TALK AIRPAGE CELLULAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRE PAY & TALK AIRPAGE CELLULAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Bischoff
CHRISTOPHER J BISCHOFF BISCHOFF & ASSOCIATES LTD1731 CENTRAL STEVANSTON, IL 60201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | WHOLESALE AND RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING TELEPHONES, PAGERS, RADIOS, AND TELEPHONE CALLING CARDS-- DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES FEATURING TELEPHONES, PAGERS AND RADIOS | ACTIVE | Jun 21, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2004 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |