USPTO serial 75557283
SPRINGHOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 5, 2002
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPRINGHOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Springhouse Technology Corporation
Exeter, Ontario N0M 1S3, CA
Other trademarks owned by Springhouse Technology Corporation
LONDON ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Bunch
JOHN W BUNCHONE CORPORATE CTR STE 3007300 METRO BLVDMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal roofing systems; namely, shingles, ridge-cappings, trims, flashings, fastening strips fasteeners and associated component hardware | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |