USPTO serial 75557381
CIRCLE OF QUALITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CIRCLE OF QUALITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DORIE G CHODERKER
DORIE G CHODERKER RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT12424 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | machinery packings and seals made of elastomers, namely, vee packings, piston cups, U-cups, loaded lip U-cups, WV packings, rod wipers, and T-seals, all for hydraulic and pneumatic equipment; diaphragms for pressure transfer applications, rubber boots for keeping dust out, rubber gasoline boots, back-up rings for seals, rubber balls for ball valves, rubber fire hydrant valve seats, high pressure water pipe gaskets, rubber grommets for installation of wires through metal holes, non-metal gaskets for static sealing applications, and rings of rubber for use as pipe connection seals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |