USPTO serial 75557544
SCOTT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCOTT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Parsippany, NJ
Parsippany, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LUCILLE P NICHOLS
LUCILLE P NICHOLS DARBY & DARBY PC805 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELEVISIONS; COMBINATION TV/VCRS; HOME STEREO SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF SPEAKERS OR HEADPHONES, AMPLIFIERS, AND ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING - COMPACT DISC PLAYERS, PHONOGRAPH RECORD PLAYERS, AUDIO CASSETTE PLAYERS, DIGITAL AUDIO TAPE PLAYERS, MP3 PLAYERS, STEREO RECEIVERS, STEREO TUNERS, STEREO GRAPHIC EQUALIZERS, SUBWOOFERS; HOME THEATER SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF SPEAKERS OR HEADPHONES, AMPLIFIERS, AND ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING - TELEVISIONS, PROJECTION TELEVISIONS, COMPUTER MONITORS, VIDEO MONITORS, PLASMA TELEVISIONS, VIDEO CASSETTE RECORDERS, DVD PLAYERS, COMPACT DISC PLAYERS, AUDIO CASSETTE PLAYERS, DIGITAL AUDIO TAPE PLAYERS, MP3 PLAYERS, STEREO RECEIVERS, STEREO TUNERS, STEREO GRAPHIC EQUALIZERS, SUBWOOFERS; VIDEO CASSETTE RECORDERS; AUDIO CASSETTE RECORDERS; DIGITAL AUDIO TAPE PLAYERS; HEADPHONES; SPEAKERS; RADIOS INCORPORATING CLOCKS; GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM RECEIVERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 29, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2000 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |