USPTO serial 75558073
NASFAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARSH, JR. JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NASFAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Canyon Country, CA
Canyon Country, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Garred
MARK B GARRED STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 2, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |