USPTO serial 75558087
COMMANDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMMANDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Eau Claire, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT L. GESKE
ROBERT L GESKE CORPORATE LEGAL MANAGERMENARD INC4777 MENARD DREAU CLAIRE, WI 54703Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | doors, door panels, door frames, door casings and door units of metal sold exclusively through MENARDS home improvement retail stores | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 14, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |