USPTO serial 75558419
SEAT GEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2005
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SEAT GEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TOTOWA, NJ
TOTOWA, NJ
CATSKILL, NJ
Logan, UT
Logan, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip Braginsky
Docketing Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.One Rockefeller PlazaIntellectual Property DepartmentNew York, NY 10020Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | vehicle seat covers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 3, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ELEGANT USA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ELEGANT USA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AUTOMOTIVE INNOVATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Saddleman, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Saddleman, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SEAT GEAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |