Drawing for YAN XIN MESSAGE CENTER XY QIGONG VITALITY NUTRIMENT

USPTO serial 75558579

YAN XIN MESSAGE CENTER XY QIGONG VITALITY NUTRIMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YAN XIN MESSAGE CENTER XY QIGONG VITALITY NUTRIMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARGARET FERGUSON

JAN TAMULEWICZ KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP101 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10178UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Food and beverage supplement consisting principally of vegetablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 2, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 2, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 9, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 24, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 19, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance