Drawing for METALSITE

USPTO serial 75558690

METALSITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with METALSITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carla J Vrsansky

CARLA J VRSANSKY BUCHANAN INGERSOLL PCONE OXFORD CTR301 GRANT ST 20TH FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing on line information via a web page on the global computer network pertaining to the sale and purchasing of steel, copper, brass and aluminumACTIVE—
036Providing on line information via a web page on the global computer network pertaining to the trading of steel, copper, brass and aluminumACTIVE—
042Providing a web page on the global computer network for interactive user exchange of information, news and publications relating to the steel, copper, brass and aluminum industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 12, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 12, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 15, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 25, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 10, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance