Drawing for PERFETTA

USPTO serial 75558793

PERFETTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2601461Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 30, 2002
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFETTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029CANNED TOMATOES; OLIVE OILEXPIREDFeb 6, 2002
030VINEGAR; PASTAEXPIREDFeb 6, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2013CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Feb 9, 2009C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 3, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jan 30, 2009E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 30, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 15, 2002CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 27, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 21, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 21, 2002PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Mar 14, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 23, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 5, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 23, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 23, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 20, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 1, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance