USPTO serial 75558836
BED BUG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BED BUG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CLARKSVILLE, AR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | AUTO PARTS AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY BED MATS FOR PICKUP TRUCKS, FLOOR MATS FOR AUTOMOBILES AND VANS, LICENCE PLATE FRAMES, SUNSHADES, SUNSCREENS, EXTERIOR INSIGNIA BADGES, FITTED AND SEMI-FITTED COVERS FOR VEHICLES, TRAILER HITCH COVERS, KEY GUARDS, MUD GUARDS AND FLAPS, MECHANIC'S CREEPERS, MOBILE TELEPHONE INDEX CLIP MOUNTS, TOOL BOXES FOR PICKUP TRUCKS, BED LINERS FOR PICKUP TRUCKS, AIR FRESHENERS FOR VEHICLES | ACTIVE | Aug 8, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |