USPTO serial 75558967
H20 NYC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MERCALDI, ANTHONY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with H20 NYC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Penrose Lucas Albright
PENROSE LUCAS ALBRIGHT MASON, MASON & ALBRIGHT2306 S EADS STP O BOX 2246ARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes, colognes and other beauty products, namely, body lotions, body creams, body powders, body gels, body moisturizers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |