USPTO serial 75559342
NEUTROGENA PORE REFINING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEUTROGENA PORE REFINING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Michael Cleary
J MICHAEL CLEARY CLEARY KOMEN & LEWIS LLP600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE SE STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Facial skin care preparations, namely, moisturizer gel, moisturizer lotion, age-retardant cream, age-retardant gel and age-retardant lotion; facial treatment cream and facial treatment lotion; body care preparations, namely, body lotion, body cream and body wash; hand cream and hand lotion; foot cream and foot lotion; cosmetics, including, foundation, make-up and face powder | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |