USPTO serial 75559390
HOLLYWEIRD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 27, 2005
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HOLLYWEIRD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Major
SCOTT J MAJOR MILLEN-WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Paulin, Kenneth R.
- Other trademarks owned by Paulin, Kenneth R.
- Other trademarks owned by Paulin, Kenneth R.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named HOLLYWEIRD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 13, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 23, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |