USPTO serial 75559414
DEEP OCEAN EXPEDITIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 29, 2001
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DEEP OCEAN EXPEDITIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RAMSEY, GB
Ramsey, Isle of Man, GB
Ramsey, Isle of Man, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID I. GREENBAUM
David I. Greenbaum Edwards Wildman Palmer LLPPO Box 130FDR StationNew York, NY 10150Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | travel services - namely, booking and conducting tours | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 29, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 31, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 29, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 24, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |