USPTO serial 75559490
XR FOUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, TAMI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XR FOUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cornelius P. Quinn
CORNELIUS P QUINN QUINN & QUINN PC5931 S MIDDLEFIELD RD STE 102LITTLETON, CO 80123UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | LARIATS MADE FROM HEMP AND ROPE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 1, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |