USPTO serial 75559739
LUCKY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUCKY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LARRY D ANDERSON
MICHAEL J DALTON DONAHUE GALLAGHER WOODS & WOOD, LLP300 LAKESIDE DR STE 1900OAKLAND, CA 94612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | bagels; bakery goods; biscuits; bread; bread sticks; cheese flavored puffed corn snacks; chili sauce; chocolate chips; chocolate syrup; cookie dough; corn chips; crackers; croutons; dessert pies; frostings; frozen and packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; frozen bagels; frozen pizza; frozen pretzels; flavored gelatin deserts and pudding; horseradish; hot sauce; muffins; pastries; pizza crust; potato chips; rice cakes and popped corn cakes; rolls; tortilla chips; and white corn syrup | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 2, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |