USPTO serial 75559786
ROYAL HAVANA RESORT & CASINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROYAL HAVANA RESORT & CASINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WHITNEY THIER
WHITNEY THIER QUIRK & TRATOS3773 HOWARD HUGHES PKWYSTE 500 NLAS VEGAS, NV 89109Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Colognes, perfumes, body lotion, skin care products, namely, skin cleansing lotion, skin cream, skin moisturizer, skin cleansing cream, facial cleansers, facial creams, facial masks, facial scrubs, facial moisturizer; facial lotion, bath and shower gels, bath oils, bath soaps, aroma therapy products, namely, aroma therapy oils; sunscreens, suntan lotions, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, body powder, lip gloss, facial cosmetics, namely, foundation, concealer, face powder, blush, eye shadow, eye liner, mascara, lip stick, and lip pencils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |