Drawing for ADAMS TAYLOR WORLDWIDE

USPTO serial 75559852

ADAMS TAYLOR WORLDWIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADAMS TAYLOR WORLDWIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT B G HOROWITZ

ROBERT B G HOROWITZ COOPER & DUNHAM LLP1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising agency services, namely-- promoting the goods and services of others in general industry through the distribution of print, television, radio and Internet advertising and by rendering sales promotion advice; placing advertisements for others, preparing advertisements for others, direct mail advertising, electronic billboard advertising, preparing audio-visual presentations for use in advertising, cooperative advertising and marketing and advertising for others via on-line electronic communications; product merchandising, public relations, publicity agent servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 10, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 24, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Jul 24, 2002PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2002PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Feb 21, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Apr 6, 2001PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2001ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jan 31, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 28, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance