CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MOTIONPRO

USPTO serial 75559965

MOTIONPRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY, SUSAN E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOTIONPRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES P. LAPOLLA

CHARLES P LAPOLLA OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, CIRCUIT BOARDS, AND DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSORS, AND ELECTRIC MOTORS AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE DEMONSTRATION, EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF MONITORS, REGULATORS AND CONTROLS FOR THE CONTROL OF ELECTRIC MOTORS AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITHACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 29, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 29, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 11, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 18, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 17, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 8, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance